Circulating Reference; Chapter 2 4/20- 4/22

In my accusations on this weeks reading I captured a lot on how we need to exam science and the makings of science. It is known that anything can be science, and when we are in a lab most people, such as myself should expand there brains and realize that anything can be a laboratory. Science is very crucial and critical; definitely not easy and everything must BE CALCULATED, from the dates to the times when you are making examinations on a experiment. it has surprised me that we all learn the same way but we do pick up things in our brains differently. I will analyze this further in our discussion. I seen what the writer is doing is mimic vocabulary of other philosophers to make a stick able claim. This was said in La tours argument the week before in order to make a abstract or a "downstream" claim things must be repeatedly said from older scientist work.

In addition to reference making all the work is a step by step process that can be subsidize to later scientific techniques and critiques to be concrete representations that cannot be pushed away. In Pandora's hope he talks about how the scientist divide the forest up into several parts in order to observe the vegation of the earths soil or crust if you will. Things in a lab work become remember or visible as color and color into data and data into text. This is what makes Lab work more abstract.

As for my understanding this type of reading was pretty much the narrow down of human understanding and controversy's. what I truly seen out of this reading is all the work it takes to make lab work a downstream accusation. The forest of Boa Vista's field work resembles the process of reference work done in a research paper that make abstract downstream claims to hold truth to science work. for example lets take the ideal of Climate change; this was first name Global warming but with more standard truths held to down streams accusations, scientist were able to change its names. accusations; such as Population deaths, atmosphere cancer, and Global heating. All these counter arguments to the name of Global warming standard changed it's name since it held truth, since it was thing that made and argument so much truth came to make it so we couldn't argue about them in the science world.

As far as humans learning science every transformation counts, by transformations I mean steps. because each human learns the same but understands differently. For instance on page 71. we talk about the triangle diagram 2.21 He states the stage by stage process that gains representation by reduction. so by reduction of out side material we regain truth. What I'm trying to say is that lets take the ideas of negative and positives, by taking out all the ways why someone should be negative we regain truth that positive is the best way to be but to make a human understand this is a step by step process seeing as everyone learns differently. You can't just give them one reason and say this is why positive is better than negative. then upstream you have to deal with the controversy if positive is better then negative. this is why field work becomes text and is so important. Circulation of reference is needed through out politics and any work of the world. even in sports circulation of references is used.